this post is just to release my pent up stress.. yes for once people i am stressed over work!!! go buuy lottery or wtr sure strike wan... to imagine wei sun here can get stressed over studies, the sun must be rising in the west or something.. no, for wei sun to even waste one week of her life, reading up on revenue law.. is something to go buy lottery already, cause she doesn't study until exams...

i plead innocent and i blame reading, there is nothing to do here, so i study == or at least try too...... no Roscoe to play with sigh.... no mamak to go to.... everywhere & everything so expensive all have to multiply by 7... no friend to drive me around.... no friend to go to the non existant mamak to....arghhh..... wasting my life away.... anyway.. back to the source of my stress....

want to know the cause?? bloody freaking revenue law, taht is what it is!!!

for the first time in my law studies, i have read 2 books, the lecture notes, and teh lecture handout, and have no freaking idea what to write!! so screweyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy....

that is not to say that i've never read more than two books in my past 2 years in law ok, my point is that, for teh first time i don't know what to write.. i mean law is partially crapping right?

jsut get the bloody facts than crap the rest... but i hv no facts..

wtf is Ramsay principle? can someone tell me??!! all the book does is this..

the Ramsay principle

as to the significance of a subsequent sale, perplanned at the time of an earlier transfer, whether by auction of on the stock market, see the discussion in paragraph 5=106 of this suplplement of....

and it goes on.. but it doesn't tell me what is the Ramsay principle, and waht are the requirements.. its pure crap...

it doesn't help that the case for Ramsay is 1979 and that there are oni bout what? less than 10 books in the library which are younger then the 1970s.. doesn't the freaking library update their revenue books.. to top it off i think there are less then 20 revenue law books there.. arghhh.. the notes don;t help much n neither does the damned handout..

SCREW THE DAMNED ESSAY!!! that's what i say....

critically evaluate the new approach my ass...ur new approach started in the ramsay, and well furniss v dawson doesnt tell me much either.. screw them all.. what is there to critically evaluate?

yes i knoe its one confusing area of law.. you know why??!! cos the House of lords din explain it when they first applied it in ramsay, it was just sthg they invented on the spot.. cos in case they din noe.. tax is goverened by statute, there is no common law for revenue.. so wtf is tehre a freaking new approach for!! and then they conveninetly decide to throw it out the window in 1989 arghhh asses!!!!

damn.... wasting my time only cis geram mati aku.. i think i will jsut write some crap and hand it in..or don bother at all and do the next assignment next term.. i think that is easier cos its a prob question anywya.. celaka, waste my time but since i already wrote one page of crap.. might as well continue la.. sigh..

anyway this post is just to lepas geram.. i wanan tidur liao.. to geram n clueless to continue the bloody essay..

besides where got ppl write one page of intro wan? got.. me la... i just wrote one whole page of intro.. based on wtr i gathered fr my 4 sources, on wat the new approach is.. sigh... might as well continue la...

ガンバテね？？まけない！！

-Oracl3-